Best CLM Software with Salesforce Integration (2026)
Why Salesforce integration matters: If your sales team lives in Salesforce, your contract tool needs to meet them there. The right integration saves hours of data entry and reduces errors.
If your organization runs on Salesforce, every tool in your stack either connects to it or creates friction. Contract management is no different. When reps close a deal, you do not want them switching to a separate system to re-enter account names, contact details, deal values, and contract terms. Then manually updating Salesforce after signing. That workflow is not just slow. It is where data entry errors happen, contracts get lost, and close dates slip.
The right CLM integration eliminates that friction (for a broader look at what CLM costs, see our CLM pricing guide). Account data flows into contracts automatically. Contract status flows back into Salesforce in real time. Your team never leaves the environment they already work in. But "Salesforce integration" means different things depending on the tool. Some CLMs are built natively on Salesforce, appearing as embedded components in your interface. Others connect through APIs, syncing data between two systems. Both work. But the depth and user experience differ a lot. Understanding this distinction is key to making the right choice.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Integration Type | Data Sync | Starting Price | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conga CLM | Native (AppExchange) | Real-time | ~$30K/year | Deep Salesforce ecosystem |
| DocuSign CLM | Native + API | Real-time | ~$25K/year | DocuSign + Salesforce users |
| Ironclad | Native + API | Real-time | ~$30K/year | Enterprise with complex workflows |
| Juro | API connector | Near real-time | ~$15K/year | Mid-market modern UX |
| Bind | API connector | Near real-time | $500/month | Growing teams, AI-first |
| PandaDoc | Native | Real-time | $35/user/mo | Sales proposals |
| SpotDraft | API connector | Near real-time | ~$10K/year | Legal ops focus |
Integration Depth Explained
Before looking at individual tools, it helps to understand the two approaches to Salesforce integration. The distinction affects user experience, setup complexity, and ongoing maintenance.
Native Salesforce Apps (Deepest Integration)
Native apps are built on the Salesforce platform itself. They appear directly in your Salesforce UI as if they were part of the product. Reps never leave Salesforce to create, send, or track contracts. The three leading native CLM apps: Conga CLM (number one paid CLM on AppExchange for 10+ years), DocuSign CLM (tight eSignature-to-Salesforce integration), and PandaDoc (strong native presence for sales teams).
The advantages: seamless user experience, real-time data sync, no context switching. The trade-offs: higher cost, possible need for a Salesforce admin, and tighter lock-in to the Salesforce ecosystem.
API-Connected Apps (Good Integration)
API-connected apps run as separate platforms that sync data with Salesforce through connectors. Contract management happens in the CLM's own interface, but key data flows between systems: account info, opportunity details, and contract status. Ironclad offers a robust connector with bi-directional sync. Juro provides modern integration with common field mapping. Bind includes Salesforce integration on its Business tier. SpotDraft connects for legal ops workflows.
The advantages: more configuration flexibility, lower pricing, and the ability to use the CLM independently for non-sales contracts. The trade-offs: a slight data lag between systems, some initial setup, and occasional interface switching.
1. Conga CLM - Best Native Salesforce Integration (see our Conga CLM pricing breakdown)
Price: ~$30,000-$100,000/year
Why It Leads for Salesforce
Conga is the dominant CLM in the Salesforce ecosystem for good reason:
- Built on Salesforce: Not just integrated - built on the platform
- CPQ connection: Seamless quote-to-contract flow
- Data inheritance: Contracts auto-populate from Salesforce records
- AppExchange leader: 10+ years as the top paid CLM app
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Native AppExchange app | Yes |
| Sidebar in Salesforce | Yes |
| Auto-populate from Opportunities | Yes |
| Contract data writes back to Salesforce | Yes |
| CPQ integration | Yes |
| Approval routing from Salesforce | Yes |
| Custom object support | Yes |
Best For
- Companies with Salesforce as their CRM backbone
- Sales teams using Salesforce CPQ
- Organizations wanting single-platform experience
- Budget: $50K+/year for CLM + implementation
Trade-offs
- Requires Salesforce (doesn't work without it)
- Expensive implementation
- Complex for simple use cases
2. DocuSign CLM - Best for DocuSign + Salesforce
Price: ~$25,000-$75,000/year
The DocuSign Advantage
If you're already using DocuSign for e-signatures, their CLM offers natural extension:
- Unified experience: Same vendor for signing and CLM
- Salesforce native app: Built for Salesforce environment
- Agreement Cloud: Part of broader DocuSign ecosystem
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Native AppExchange app | Yes |
| E-signature in Salesforce | Yes |
| Auto-populate contracts | Yes |
| Contract status in Salesforce | Yes |
| Salesforce reports/dashboards | Yes |
| Mobile app integration | Yes |
Best For
- Companies already using DocuSign eSignature
- Salesforce-centric sales organizations
- Mid-to-large enterprises
- Budget: $25K-$75K/year
Trade-offs
- Best value if you're already in DocuSign ecosystem
- CLM is the newer part of their offering
- Can get expensive with full suite
3. Ironclad - Best for Enterprise Workflows (see our Ironclad pricing breakdown)
Price: ~$30,000-$150,000/year
Enterprise-Grade Salesforce Connection
Ironclad's Salesforce integration is built for complex enterprise requirements:
- Bi-directional sync: Data flows both ways
- Custom field mapping: Connect any Salesforce field
- Workflow triggers: Salesforce events can trigger Ironclad workflows
- Deep visibility: See contract status from Salesforce
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Bi-directional sync | Yes |
| Custom field mapping | Yes |
| Workflow triggers | Yes |
| Salesforce sidebar | Yes |
| Opportunity association | Yes |
| Account/Contact sync | Yes |
| Custom object support | Yes |
Best For
- Enterprise legal teams
- Complex approval workflows
- High contract volumes
- Companies with dedicated Salesforce admins
Trade-offs
- Premium pricing
- Requires implementation effort
- May be overkill for simple needs
4. Juro - Best Modern UX with Salesforce
Price: ~$15,000-$40,000/year
Fresh Approach to Salesforce Integration
Juro brings modern UX to the Salesforce connection:
- Clean integration: No clunky plugins
- Quick setup: Faster than enterprise alternatives
- Real-time updates: Contract status reflects in Salesforce
- HubSpot too: If you use both CRMs
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Salesforce connector | Yes |
| Auto-create contracts from Opportunities | Yes |
| Sync contract status | Yes |
| Map custom fields | Yes |
| Bulk sync | Yes |
Best For
- Mid-market companies (100-500 employees)
- Teams that value UX
- Modern, fast-growth companies
- Budget: $15K-$40K/year
Trade-offs
- Integration not as deep as native apps
- Fewer Salesforce-specific features
- Growing feature set
5. Bind - Best Value with Salesforce Integration
Price: $500/month (Business tier)
AI-First with Salesforce Connection
Bind offers Salesforce integration on the Business tier at a fraction of enterprise pricing:
- CRM sync: Connect contracts to Salesforce accounts and opportunities
- Data auto-fill: Pull Salesforce data into contracts
- Status tracking: See contract status from Salesforce
- AI advantage: Conversational drafting + Salesforce data
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Salesforce connector | Yes (Business) |
| Auto-populate contracts | Yes |
| Opportunity association | Yes |
| Contract status sync | Yes |
| Account/Contact sync | Yes |
Best For
- Growing companies with Salesforce
- Teams wanting AI + Salesforce integration
- Budget-conscious organizations
- Companies under 100 employees
Trade-offs
- Requires Business tier ($500/month)
- Integration not as deep as Conga/DocuSign
- Newer platform
6. PandaDoc - Best for Sales Proposals
Price: $35-65/user/month
Sales-Focused Salesforce Integration
PandaDoc's Salesforce integration is optimized for sales workflows:
- Proposal from Salesforce: Create proposals directly from opportunities
- Product sync: Pull pricing from Salesforce
- Activity tracking: Document activity logs to Salesforce
- Native experience: Built for Salesforce users
Salesforce Integration Features
| Feature | Available |
|---|---|
| Native AppExchange app | Yes |
| Salesforce sidebar | Yes |
| Product/Price Book sync | Yes |
| Opportunity association | Yes |
| Activity logging | Yes |
| Custom fields | Limited |
Best For
- Sales teams sending proposals
- Salesforce-native sales processes
- B2B companies
- Per-user budget model works
Trade-offs
- More proposal than contract focused
- Per-user pricing adds up
- Less legal workflow support
Comparison: Integration Depth
| Feature | Conga | DocuSign CLM | Ironclad | Juro | Bind |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native AppExchange | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Salesforce sidebar | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Bi-directional sync | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CPQ integration | Yes | Yes | Limited | No | No |
| Custom object support | Yes | Yes | Yes | Limited | Limited |
| Real-time updates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Setup complexity | High | High | Medium | Low | Low |
| Admin required | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Pricing Comparison
| Tool | Starting Price | Per-User Fees | Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conga CLM | ~$30K/year | Yes | $30K-$100K |
| DocuSign CLM | ~$25K/year | Yes | $20K-$50K |
| Ironclad | ~$30K/year | Yes | $20K-$50K |
| Juro | ~$15K/year | No | Included |
| Bind | $500/month | +$90/user | None |
| PandaDoc | $35/user/month | Yes | Minimal |
Decision Guide
The right choice depends on how central Salesforce is to your operations, how deep an integration you need, and your budget. Here is how to match your situation to the best option.
Choose Conga if:
Conga is the clear choice when Salesforce is the backbone of your operations and you want contracts to feel native. It is especially strong with Salesforce CPQ. Pricing data, product configurations, and approval rules flow straight from quote to contract. You will need $50K+ per year and a Salesforce admin for setup. But for Salesforce-centric organizations, no CLM matches this depth of integration.
Choose DocuSign CLM if:
DocuSign CLM makes the most sense if you already use DocuSign for e-signatures and want to extend into full CLM. One vendor for signing and CLM simplifies procurement and support. The Salesforce integration is strong with a native AppExchange app and in-app signing. At $30K+ per year, it is a mid-to-large enterprise investment. But the unified signing and CLM experience is genuinely valuable if you are already in the DocuSign ecosystem.
Choose Ironclad if:
Ironclad fits enterprise organizations with complex contract approval workflows beyond simple sales contracts. Your legal team may need sophisticated routing: high-value contracts go to the VP, international deals need compliance review, certain clause changes require legal counsel. Ironclad's Workflow Studio handles all of that. The Salesforce integration supports bi-directional sync, custom field mapping, and workflow triggers. At $40K+ per year, it is a serious investment. But it scales from mid-market to enterprise.
Choose Juro if:
Juro is the best option for mid-market companies that value modern UX and fast setup. Enterprise tools like Conga and Ironclad can take months. Juro typically goes live in days to weeks. It covers the essentials: creating contracts from opportunities, syncing status, mapping custom fields. No native app complexity. At $15K-$40K per year, it balances capability and cost well for companies with 100-500 employees.
Choose Bind if:
Bind is the right starting point for growing companies under 100 employees that want Salesforce integration without enterprise complexity or pricing. The Business tier at $500/month includes a Salesforce connector for auto-population, opportunity association, and status syncing. Bind's AI-first approach adds something unique: you can draft contracts conversationally using Salesforce data as context. Learn how Bind helps sales teams close deals faster with CRM-connected contract workflows. If $15K+ per year for Juro or Ironclad is beyond your budget, Bind delivers meaningful integration at a fraction of the cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need native Salesforce integration?
Not necessarily. This is one of the most common misconceptions in CLM buying. API-based integrations work well for most use cases: syncing account data, pulling opportunity details into contracts, and writing status back to Salesforce. Native integration matters most when reps need to create and manage contracts without leaving Salesforce, or when you need real-time sync for complex CPQ workflows. If your team is fine switching tabs and your needs are straightforward, an API-connected CLM saves significant cost while still delivering the core benefits.
Can I use CLM without Salesforce?
Yes. All tools in this guide work as standalone platforms, except Conga, which requires Salesforce. For Ironclad, Juro, Bind, and PandaDoc, Salesforce integration is optional. This matters if you have contracts outside the sales process (vendor agreements, employment contracts, partnerships) that do not involve Salesforce at all. A CLM that works with and without Salesforce gives you flexibility as your processes evolve.
What data typically syncs?
Standard data flow includes account info, contact details, opportunity data (deal value, close date, stage), contract status, key dates, and custom fields. The most important thing is bi-directionality. Data should flow from Salesforce into the contract during creation (no manual entry). Contract status should flow back after signing (so opportunities update automatically). When evaluating, ask which fields sync, whether sync is real-time or batched, and whether you can map custom Salesforce fields to CLM fields.
How long does Salesforce integration setup take?
The timeline varies a lot by integration type. Native apps like Conga and DocuSign typically take 2-4 weeks. That includes field mapping, workflow configuration, and testing. They usually require a Salesforce admin. API connectors like Juro and Bind are much faster, usually taking 1-2 days to configure and test. Native apps have more options (and more decisions). API connectors offer a more standardized setup with fewer moving parts.
The Bottom Line
The best CLM for Salesforce depends on how deep you need the integration, your budget, and whether your team benefits more from a native in-Salesforce experience or a standalone platform that syncs reliably.
For deep Salesforce integration: Conga CLM ($30K+/year) is the gold standard for contracts living natively inside Salesforce, especially with Salesforce CPQ.
For DocuSign users: DocuSign CLM ($25K+/year) unifies your signing and CLM under one vendor, with strong Salesforce connectivity built in.
For mid-market modern experience: Juro ($15K+/year) balances solid Salesforce integration with a clean, modern user experience and fast implementation.
For growing teams on a budget: Bind Business ($500/month) delivers AI-powered contract management with Salesforce integration at a fraction of enterprise pricing. It is the most accessible entry point for companies that need both.
Related Articles
Ready to simplify your contracts?
See how Bind helps in-house legal teams manage contracts from draft to signature in one platform.
Book a demo