Best Agiloft Alternatives (2026): Modern CLM Options

Agiloft is powerful - but its dated interface and complexity aren't for everyone. If you need more modern UX, faster implementation, or different pricing, here are the best alternatives.

If you've used Agiloft for a while, you know the feeling. The platform can do almost anything. But getting it to do what you need often takes too much effort. The no-code builder is impressive, but the learning curve is steep. The interface feels dated. Every customization cascades into more admin overhead. You end up managing the tool more than managing contracts.

Or maybe you're evaluating Agiloft for the first time and wondering if the power is worth the complexity. For a head-to-head comparison with another enterprise player, see our Conga vs Agiloft guide. Fair question. The CLM market has evolved. Several modern alternatives now offer 80-90% of Agiloft's features with much better UX and faster time to value. The right choice depends on what matters most: flexibility, modern UX, speed, or budget.

This guide walks through the top alternatives with honest comparisons.

Why Consider Agiloft Alternatives?

Quick Comparison

What Agiloft Does Well

Before looking at alternatives, it's worth acknowledging what makes Agiloft unique. Understanding these strengths helps you evaluate what you might give up.

Agiloft's no-code customization engine is arguably the most flexible in the industry. You can build virtually any workflow without code. That's why organizations with specialized processes gravitate toward it. The legitimate free tier for up to 10 users is unmatched by modern competitors. It makes Agiloft accessible for small teams that want to test first.

For organizations with strict security needs, Agiloft's on-premise deployment option is a real differentiator. Self-hosted CLM is increasingly rare. For government, healthcare, or high-security environments, this can be the deciding factor. Add the 99.6% implementation success rate and the ability to handle virtually any process, and it's clear why Agiloft keeps a loyal following despite its UX challenges.

Top Agiloft Alternatives

1. Ironclad - Best Modern Enterprise (see our Ironclad pricing breakdown)

Price: ~$30,000-$150,000/year

Why choose Ironclad over Agiloft:

Ironclad is the natural pick for teams that want enterprise power without Agiloft's dated interface. The UX is clean and modern. Legal and business teams actually enjoy using it, which helps adoption. Implementation takes 2-3 months instead of Agiloft's 3-6. The Workflow Studio offers visual workflow building with real automation and a gentler learning curve. If you rely on Salesforce, Workday, or NetSuite, Ironclad's integrations are smoother than Agiloft's.

How Ironclad compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II
• ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
• HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA

Best for: Enterprise teams who want Agiloft's power with modern UX.

Trade-offs: No free tier. No on-premise option. Higher starting cost.

2. Juro - Best Modern UX

Price: ~$15,000-$40,000/year

Why choose Juro over Agiloft:

If UX is driving you away from Agiloft, Juro is the opposite end of the design spectrum. Everything happens in the browser. No plugins or desktop apps. Multiple editors work on the same contract at once. The platform was designed for legal professionals but built for anyone on the team. Adoption is fast. Where Agiloft implementations take months, Juro teams go live in a week or two.

How Juro compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II
• ISO 27001
• GDPR

Best for: Mid-market teams who prioritize UX over customization.

Trade-offs: Less customizable. No free tier. No playbook automation.

3. Bind - Best Value Alternative

Price: $90/seat/month (Starter) | $500/month (Business)

Why choose Bind over Agiloft:

Bind takes a completely different approach. Instead of building complex no-code workflows, you tell the AI what you need. You get a complete, professional contract in seconds. Agiloft's architecture wasn't designed for this kind of experience. For growing teams that want modern AI without maximum customization, Bind delivers at ~95% lower cost. That's $6K/year versus $40K+ for a comparable Agiloft setup. Nothing to configure or implement. You're running in minutes, not months.

How Bind compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II
• GDPR

Best for: Teams who want modern CLM without customization complexity.

Trade-offs: Less customizable. No on-premise. Newer platform.

Book a demo →

4. Icertis - Best Fortune 500 Alternative

Price: ~$100,000-$500,000/year

Why choose Icertis over Agiloft:

If you're at true enterprise scale and Agiloft's customization isn't making up for its UX, Icertis is built for Fortune 500 complexity. It has the deepest ERP integration in the market. Native SAP and Oracle connectors go well beyond what Agiloft offers. The Icertis Explore AI engine provides genuine contract intelligence. FedRAMP authorization and 40+ certifications make it suitable for even the most regulated industries.

How Icertis compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1
• ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
• HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, FedRAMP

Best for: Fortune 500 companies who need enterprise scale and ERP integration.

Trade-offs: Very expensive. Long implementation. Overkill for most.

5. DocuSign CLM - Best for DocuSign Users

Price: ~$25,000-$100,000/year

Why choose DocuSign CLM over Agiloft:

If you're already in the DocuSign ecosystem, their CLM eliminates the friction of managing contracts across platforms. E-signatures are native, not bolted on through a connector. That makes the end-to-end experience smoother. The DocuSign brand carries weight with counterparties, reducing signing hesitation. For Salesforce-heavy organizations, the integration is excellent. One vendor for both e-signatures and CLM simplifies procurement and vendor management.

How DocuSign CLM compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1
• ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
• HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, FedRAMP

Best for: Organizations already in DocuSign ecosystem.

Trade-offs: CLM is newer addition. Less customizable than Agiloft.

6. ContractPodAi - Best AI Alternative

Price: ~$50,000-$200,000/year

Why choose ContractPodAi over Agiloft:

For enterprise teams where AI is the top priority, ContractPodAi brings capabilities Agiloft can't match. The AIDA assistant lets users ask natural language questions about their contracts. Automated risk scoring assesses clause-level risk without manual review. If you run on Microsoft Office 365 and Teams, ContractPodAi's integration is among the best. The interface is noticeably more modern than Agiloft's, though it comes with a significant price tag.

How ContractPodAi compares to Agiloft:

Security & Compliance:

• SOC 2 Type II
• ISO 27001, ISO 27017
• HIPAA, GDPR

Best for: Enterprise teams who prioritize AI over maximum customization.

Trade-offs: Very expensive. No free tier. Enterprise-only focus.

Feature Comparison

Core CLM Features

All four platforms (Agiloft, Ironclad, Juro, Bind) include contract drafting, e-signatures, clause libraries, and version control. Template libraries vary: Bind offers 300+, while others have good coverage. Agiloft and Ironclad offer advanced repository search.

Customization & Workflows

Security & Deployment

Cost Comparison

Year 1 Total Cost

3-Year Total Cost

Decision Framework

The right CLM depends on where your organization is today and where it's heading.

Choose Ironclad if:

You want enterprise power with a modern feel. Ironclad fits organizations with 500+ employees and budgets of $50K+/year. It offers sophisticated playbook automation with a 2-3 month implementation. If you want a natural upgrade from Agiloft without the dated interface, Ironclad is the strongest pick.

Choose Juro if:

UX and speed matter more than deep customization. Juro is ideal for mid-market companies (50-500 employees) with $15K-$40K/year budgets. If Agiloft's complexity frustrates your team and you'd rather go live in weeks, Juro delivers a clean, modern experience people actually enjoy.

Choose Bind if:

You're a growing team that wants AI-powered contract management without the overhead. Under 200 employees, budget under $10K/year, and AI drafting matters more than deep customization. Bind gets you running in minutes with a conversational interface that makes contract creation effortless.

Choose Icertis if:

You're at Fortune 500 scale with complex global requirements. Icertis is right when you need deep SAP or Oracle integration, FedRAMP is mandatory, and your budget supports $200K+/year. If you manage millions of contracts across regions and entities, this platform is built for that.

Choose DocuSign CLM if:

You're already in the DocuSign ecosystem. Brand recognition matters for counterparty trust, you need strong Salesforce integration, or FedRAMP is required. DocuSign CLM unifies e-signatures and contract management under one vendor at $30K-$100K/year.

Choose ContractPodAi if:

Advanced AI and Microsoft integration are your top priorities. For enterprises (500+ employees) on Office 365 and Teams, ContractPodAi's AIDA assistant and automated risk scoring go far beyond Agiloft's basic AI. Budget $75K+/year.

Stay with Agiloft if:

Your situation genuinely requires what only Agiloft can offer. Maximum no-code customization is essential, on-premise is a hard requirement, or you have unique workflows no other platform can handle. The free tier is also valuable for teams that want to evaluate before committing budget.

Migration from Agiloft

Migrating from Agiloft takes some planning. Deep customization means your setup may be more complex than average. The good news: core contract data (PDFs and metadata) transfers easily. The bigger challenge is recreating workflows. This is also a chance to simplify processes that may have grown too complex over time.

Export from Agiloft

1. Export contract repository (PDFs)
2. Export custom metadata (CSV)
3. Document workflow configurations
4. Export template library
5. Note custom field mappings

Import to Alternative

1. Upload contract files
2. Import metadata via CSV
3. Recreate simplified workflows
4. Set up templates
5. Configure integrations

Most teams find that migrating to a simpler platform is a welcome reset. The workflows you recreate tend to be leaner and more effective than what accumulated in Agiloft.

Timeline

• To Ironclad: 2-3 months
• To Juro: 2-4 weeks
• To Bind: 1-2 weeks
• To DocuSign CLM: 1-2 months

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Agiloft's interface dated?

Agiloft was founded in 1991, making it one of the oldest players in contract management. The company always prioritized customization and flexibility over visual design. That shows in the interface today. The platform is deeply functional and handles virtually any workflow. But the UX hasn't kept pace with modern SaaS. If you're used to tools like Notion or Slack, the contrast is jarring. Agiloft has made incremental improvements, but the core architecture reflects a different era.

Can alternatives match Agiloft's customization?

Ironclad comes closest, especially with its Workflow Studio for approval chains and conditional routing. But most modern alternatives (Juro, Bind, DocuSign CLM) deliberately prioritize ease of use over unlimited flexibility. The real question: does your team actually need Agiloft-level customization? Most organizations use only a fraction of Agiloft's configuration. The overhead of maintaining those customizations often outweighs the benefits. A simpler tool covering 80-90% of your needs can be far more effective day to day.

What about Agiloft's free tier?

Agiloft's free tier is genuinely generous: full functionality for up to 10 users. No modern CLM competitor matches this. It makes Agiloft uniquely accessible for small teams that want to evaluate without paying. Bind offers personalized demos, and most enterprise CLMs require a sales process before you see the product. The free tier is also a good way to prototype workflows before a larger deployment.

Is on-premise still important?

For most organizations in 2026, cloud is standard. But on-premise remains critical for some sectors. Government agencies, healthcare organizations, defense contractors, and highly regulated industries may mandate self-hosted solutions. Agiloft is one of the very few CLM platforms still offering genuine on-premise deployment. If your security team requires on-premise, your options narrow fast.

How do alternatives compare on implementation?

Implementation time is one of the biggest differences. Agiloft's flexibility is a double-edged sword: it can handle any process, but configuration takes 3-6 months. Ironclad's structured approach brings that to 2-3 months. Juro's focused design enables 1-2 week implementations. Bind, with no configuration needed, gets teams running in minutes. Many teams switching from Agiloft are surprised by how fast they get productive on a modern platform.

The Bottom Line

Agiloft is powerful - but its dated interface and complexity aren't for everyone. The good news is that the CLM market has matured to the point where you have genuine alternatives at every price point and complexity level.

For modern enterprise: Ironclad (~$50K) offers similar power with much better UX, making it the most natural step up for teams that have outgrown Agiloft's interface.

For mid-market simplicity: Juro (~$15K) delivers modern, browser-native collaboration without the complexity that slows teams down.

For AI-first approach: Bind ($500/mo) provides conversational drafting and instant setup at a price point that makes enterprise CLM capabilities accessible to growing teams.

For Fortune 500: Icertis (~$150K) scales for the largest organizations with deep ERP integration and global compliance.

For DocuSign users: DocuSign CLM (~$35K) unifies e-sign and CLM in a single ecosystem.

The best alternative depends on your team size, budget, and what's causing friction today. If you're unsure, the fastest way to decide is to see a modern approach in action.

Related Articles

• Conga vs Agiloft: Enterprise CLM Comparison
• Ironclad Alternatives: Cheaper Options
• Best CLM for Legal Teams
• Icertis Alternatives: Enterprise CLM Options
• CLM Pricing Guide 2026