Best Enterprise Contract Management Software in 2026
Enterprise contract management is a different discipline from contract management at smaller organizations. When you are managing thousands of contracts across multiple business units, jurisdictions, and compliance regimes, the requirements change fundamentally. You need platforms that handle scale, enforce governance, and integrate deeply with the ERP and CRM systems that run your business.
This guide covers CLM platforms built for organizations with 1,000+ employees. These are not tools you sign up for with a credit card. They require procurement cycles, implementation consultants, and dedicated admin resources. That is the reality of enterprise CLM, and understanding it upfront saves months of misaligned expectations.
We analyzed the leading enterprise CLM platforms based on Gartner Magic Quadrant positioning, G2 and Capterra ratings, feature depth for large-scale contract operations, integration capabilities with enterprise systems (SAP, Salesforce, Oracle), compliance certifications, and verified user feedback from organizations with 1,000+ employees.
Bind is not included in this list. We build Bind for in-house legal teams at growing companies, not for enterprises managing tens of thousands of contracts across global operations. Where relevant, we note where Bind fits as an alternative for teams that do not need enterprise-grade complexity.
Why Enterprise CLM Is Different
Mid-market CLM tools work well for teams of 2 to 15 people managing a few hundred contracts. Enterprise CLM operates at a different scale entirely. The differences are not incremental. They are structural.
6-18 months
typical enterprise CLM implementation timeline
Whatfix CLM Implementation Guide, 2025
Enterprise organizations face challenges that smaller companies simply do not encounter. Thousands of legacy contracts need to be migrated, digitized, and made searchable. Multi-entity structures require contracts to flow through different approval chains depending on the subsidiary, region, or contract type. Regulatory compliance is not optional, whether it is HIPAA, SOX, GDPR, or industry-specific mandates. And the integration requirements are substantial: your CLM needs to talk to SAP, Salesforce, Oracle, ServiceNow, and whatever else runs your operations.
The tools in this guide are built for that complexity. They come with matching price tags and implementation timelines. For a full breakdown of what these platforms cost, see the CLM pricing guide.
Mid-Market CLM Needs
- Simple approval workflows with 2-3 steps
- Standard templates for common contract types
- Basic integrations with CRM or email
- Repository with search and key date alerts
Enterprise CLM Needs
- Multi-branch approval chains across business units and regions
- Custom clause libraries enforced by compliance policies
- Deep integration with ERP, CRM, procurement, and finance systems
- AI-powered extraction, obligation tracking, and portfolio analytics at scale
Jump to the best platform for your situation:
Icertis
Best for: Large enterprises in regulated industries (pharma, manufacturing, financial services)
Pricing: Contact for pricing (estimated $100,000+/year for enterprise deployments)
Icertis Contract Intelligence (ICI) is the incumbent leader in enterprise CLM. The platform transforms contracts from static documents into structured, analyzable data, extracting obligations, risks, and performance metrics across entire portfolios. Icertis serves some of the largest companies in the world, including Johnson & Johnson, Microsoft, and Daimler. It is recognized as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM.
Key Features:
- Contract intelligence engine that structures and connects data across the entire portfolio
- AI-powered risk identification, compliance monitoring, and obligation tracking
- Deep integration with SAP, Salesforce, Oracle, and other enterprise platforms
- Multi-language support across 90+ countries
Strengths:
- Best-in-class contract analytics and intelligence for organizations managing 10,000+ contracts
- Strongest presence in heavily regulated industries where compliance is non-negotiable
- Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader with the broadest enterprise customer base
Limitations:
- Implementation is lengthy and challenging; users report needing to redo initial configurations
- UI described as cluttered and dated compared to modern competitors
- 34% more expensive than the market average according to G2 data
G2 Rating: 4.2/5
Ironclad
Best for: Enterprise legal teams needing sophisticated workflow automation and AI review
Pricing: Custom pricing (typically $60,000-$150,000+/year)
Ironclad is the enterprise CLM platform of choice for legal teams at high-growth tech companies and Fortune 500 organizations. Named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM for the third consecutive year, Ironclad focuses on workflow automation, allowing legal teams to design complex approval chains, routing rules, and conditional logic without code. The platform recently launched Jurist, an agentic AI assistant purpose-built for legal contract review.
Key Features:
- Workflow Studio for visual, no-code approval chain design
- Jurist AI agent for automated contract review and playbook enforcement
- Deep Salesforce integration with native e-signature
- Post-signature repository with contract intelligence and analytics
Strengths:
- Industry-leading workflow engine for multi-stakeholder approval processes
- AI capabilities (Jurist) represent a genuine leap forward for automated legal review
- Strong adoption among tech companies and enterprises with complex contracting needs
Limitations:
- Per-seat pricing with additional costs for AI features and integrations makes budgeting difficult
- Implementation takes 2-3 months minimum, often longer for complex deployments
- Template editor is rigid; reuploading contracts requires re-tagging metadata
G2 Rating: 4.5/5
Agiloft
Best for: Organizations needing heavy customization of workflows and processes
Pricing: Custom pricing ($6,000-$60,000+/year depending on configuration)
Agiloft is the most configurable CLM platform on the market. It provides a no-code environment where non-technical users can customize workflows, fields, approval logic, and dashboards to match virtually any contract process. Named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM for the sixth consecutive year, Agiloft is built for organizations whose contract workflows do not fit into standard templates. The platform recently launched AI-driven Obligation Management and enhanced its ConvoAI capabilities.
Key Features:
- No-code workflow and field configuration engine
- ConvoAI for AI-assisted contract review and "Ask AI" natural language queries
- AI-powered obligation tracking and compliance management
- Self-hosted deployment option for strict data residency requirements
Strengths:
- Most flexible CLM available; adapts to virtually any workflow or industry-specific requirement
- Concurrent user licensing model enables broad organizational access without per-seat cost pressure
- Six consecutive years as a Gartner CLM Leader validates long-term reliability
Limitations:
- UI feels dated compared to modern competitors like Ironclad or Juro
- Initial configuration requires implementation consultants and significant upfront investment
- Flexibility creates risk of over-engineering; complex setups become difficult to maintain
G2 Rating: 4.6/5
DocuSign CLM
Best for: Organizations already invested in the DocuSign ecosystem
Pricing: Custom pricing (enterprise deployments typically $50,000-$500,000+/year)
DocuSign CLM is the contract lifecycle management product from DocuSign, separate from their well-known e-signature tool. Named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM, DocuSign CLM offers AI-assisted review through the Iris AI engine, a drag-and-drop workflow builder with 100+ pre-configured steps, and one of the broadest integration ecosystems in the market. DocuSign has also introduced Maestro workflows for WhatsApp and SMS-based agreement delivery.
Key Features:
- Iris AI engine for contract review, analysis, and risk identification
- Drag-and-drop workflow builder with 100+ pre-configured workflow steps
- Broad integration ecosystem with Salesforce, Oracle, SAP, Google Workspace, and Slack
- FedRAMP authorization for government and public sector use
Strengths:
- Strongest brand recognition in the contract space, which simplifies stakeholder buy-in
- Six consecutive years as a Gartner CLM Leader
- FedRAMP authorization makes it the default choice for government contractors
Limitations:
- DocuSign eSignature and CLM are separate products; signed contracts from eSign must be manually uploaded to CLM
- Redlining and negotiation functionality is weaker than competitors
- Users report aggressive upselling and inconsistent customer support quality
G2 Rating: 4.5/5
Conga CLM
Best for: Salesforce-centric organizations wanting CLM embedded in their CRM
Pricing: Custom pricing (enterprise tiers available; contact for quote)
Conga CLM is built for organizations that want contract management embedded directly into Salesforce. Rather than asking users to learn a new platform, Conga works within the tools teams already use. The platform includes AI-powered risk assessment, clause deviation flagging, and workflow automation. In February 2026, Conga acquired PROS Holdings' B2B business to integrate AI-driven pricing intelligence into its contract workflows. Conga holds G2 Leader recognition across CLM, Contract Analytics, and Contract Management categories.
Key Features:
- Native Salesforce integration that operates within the Salesforce UI
- AI-powered risk assessment and clause deviation detection
- Document generation and contract assembly with X-Author for Word
- Revenue lifecycle management connecting quotes, contracts, and billing
Strengths:
- Deepest Salesforce-native integration available; users never leave their CRM
- G2 Leader with top rankings for Enterprise Usability and Enterprise Relationships
- Revenue lifecycle approach connects contracts to broader commercial operations
Limitations:
- Heavily dependent on Salesforce; limited standalone value for non-Salesforce organizations
- Template management with X-Author requires dedicated resources and training
- UI described as basic and clunky by multiple reviewers
G2 Rating: ~4.3/5
SAP Ariba Contracts
Best for: SAP-centric enterprises managing procurement and supplier contracts
Pricing: Custom pricing (contact SAP; enterprise procurement suites typically $100,000+/year)
SAP Ariba Contracts is the contract management module within SAP's broader procurement and spend management suite. It is purpose-built for procurement-centric contract management, connecting contracts to sourcing events, purchase orders, and supplier performance data. In February 2026, SAP released a completely rebuilt version of Ariba on top of the SAP Business Technology Platform, with deeper integration to Icertis Contract Intelligence and a new AI assistant (Joule) for contract analysis.
Key Features:
- Native integration with SAP ERP, S/4HANA, and the broader SAP Business Suite
- Icertis partnership for advanced contract intelligence within the Ariba ecosystem
- Joule AI for automatic key information extraction, summaries, and compliance checks
- Clause library with drag-and-drop authoring for procurement contracts
Strengths:
- Unmatched integration depth for organizations running SAP as their core ERP
- Procurement-centric design connects contracts to sourcing, POs, and supplier performance
- Rebuilt platform (February 2026) with modern architecture and open APIs for third-party systems
Limitations:
- Only makes sense for organizations already invested in the SAP ecosystem
- Historically clunky UI; the 2026 rebuild addresses this but adoption of the new interface is still early
- Contract management capabilities are narrower than dedicated CLM platforms; primarily serves procurement use cases
G2 Rating: ~3.9/5 (limited CLM-specific reviews)
Leah
Best for: Enterprise legal and procurement teams wanting AI agent-driven automation
Pricing: Starting from $50,000/year (tiered by licensing volume)
Leah, formerly ContractPodAi, rebranded in January 2026 to signal a broader vision beyond traditional CLM. The platform is built around AI agents that automate legal, procurement, and finance workflows, going beyond document management to orchestrate entire contracting processes with minimal human intervention. Leah was named a CLM Visionary by Gartner for five consecutive years and a Leader in the 2025 IDC MarketScape for AI-Enabled Buy-Side CLM Applications.
Key Features:
- AI agent architecture with specialized agents for drafting, review, extraction, and negotiation
- Multi-document data extraction across legal, procurement, and finance contracts
- Document translation in 60+ languages
- AI-powered risk scoring and compliance monitoring
Strengths:
- AI agent approach represents the most forward-looking architecture in enterprise CLM
- Document translation across 60+ languages is a genuine differentiator for global operations
- IDC MarketScape Leader recognition validates enterprise AI capabilities
Limitations:
- Starting at $50,000/year, pricing is firmly enterprise-only territory
- Smaller review volume on G2 and Capterra makes independent verification difficult
- Rebrand from ContractPodAi to Leah creates market confusion; brand recognition is still catching up
G2 Rating: ~4.4/5 (limited reviews)
Sirion
Best for: Enterprises focused on post-signature contract governance and obligation management
Pricing: Custom pricing (enterprise deployments typically six figures annually)
Sirion is an AI-native enterprise CLM platform built for large organizations managing complex, high-volume contracting. Named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM for the fourth consecutive year, Sirion was positioned highest on Ability to Execute and furthest right on Completeness of Vision among all 16 vendors evaluated. The platform differentiates through its post-signature governance capabilities, with AI agents that actively track obligations, monitor compliance, and reconcile invoices against contract terms.
Key Features:
- Agentic AI with specialized Extraction, Issue Detection, Redline, and Obligation agents
- Invoice Agent that reconciles invoices against contract terms automatically
- Post-execution governance with obligation tracking and compliance monitoring
- AI-powered drafting, risk scoring, and workflow automation
Strengths:
- Strongest post-signature governance capabilities in the market
- Highest-positioned vendor in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM
- Enterprise reviewers rate it 4.9/5 on G2, indicating exceptional satisfaction at scale
Limitations:
- Enterprise-only pricing puts it out of reach for organizations under 500 employees
- Implementation requires significant configuration and professional services engagement
- Relatively less well-known than Icertis or DocuSign, which can complicate internal procurement approvals
G2 Rating: ~4.7/5 (enterprise segment)
Enterprise CLM Comparison
| Platform | Gartner 2025 | Best For | Est. Annual Cost | Implementation |
|---|
| Icertis | Leader | Regulated industries | $100K+ | 6-12 months |
| Ironclad | Leader | Workflow automation | $60K-$150K+ | 2-6 months |
| Agiloft | Leader (6 yrs) | Custom workflows | $6K-$60K+ | 3-9 months |
| DocuSign CLM | Leader | DocuSign ecosystem | $50K-$500K+ | 3-6 months |
| Conga CLM | Evaluated | Salesforce-native | Custom | 3-6 months |
| SAP Ariba | Evaluated | SAP ecosystem | $100K+ | 6-12 months |
| Leah | Visionary (5 yrs) | AI agents | $50K+ | 3-6 months |
| Sirion | Leader (4 yrs) | Post-signature governance | Six figures | 3-9 months |
How to Choose the Right Enterprise CLM
Enterprise CLM purchases involve multiple stakeholders, long evaluation cycles, and significant budgets. Getting the decision wrong is expensive in both dollars and organizational momentum. These frameworks help narrow the field before you enter formal RFP processes.
By Primary Use Case
If your priority is contract intelligence and analytics at scale, Icertis and Sirion lead the field. Icertis has the broadest enterprise customer base in regulated industries. Sirion has the strongest post-signature governance with AI agents that actively track obligations and flag compliance gaps.
If your priority is workflow automation for legal teams, Ironclad is the strongest choice. Its Workflow Studio and Jurist AI agent are purpose-built for the complex, multi-stakeholder approval processes that enterprise legal departments manage daily.
If your priority is deep customization, Agiloft offers the most flexible no-code configuration engine. It adapts to processes that other platforms cannot support, though that flexibility demands ongoing admin investment.
If your priority is ecosystem integration, choose based on your core platform. DocuSign CLM for the DocuSign ecosystem, Conga for Salesforce-centric operations, SAP Ariba for SAP-centric procurement.
By Industry
| Industry | Recommended Platforms |
|---|
| Pharma / Life Sciences | Icertis, Sirion |
| Financial Services | Icertis, Ironclad, Sirion |
| Technology | Ironclad, Agiloft |
| Manufacturing | Icertis, SAP Ariba |
| Government / Public Sector | DocuSign CLM (FedRAMP), Agiloft |
By Budget
| Annual Budget | Options |
|---|
| $25K-$75K | Agiloft, Ironclad (starter) |
| $75K-$150K | Ironclad, Leah, Sirion |
| $150K+ | Icertis, DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba |
Common Mistakes in Enterprise CLM Selection
Mistake 1: Selecting Based on Feature Lists
Every enterprise CLM vendor can produce a feature matrix that checks every box. The differentiator is execution quality, not feature presence. During evaluation, focus on live demonstrations of your actual workflows. Ask vendors to configure a real approval process from your organization, not a canned demo. The platform that handles your specific use case best will outperform the one with the longest feature list.
Mistake 2: Underestimating Change Management
The technology is the easy part. Getting 5,000 employees across legal, procurement, sales, and finance to actually use the new CLM is where enterprise implementations succeed or fail. Budget at least 20% of your total CLM investment for training, change management, and user adoption programs. Without it, you will have an expensive tool that a fraction of your organization uses.
Mistake 3: Ignoring Total Cost of Ownership
The license fee is the beginning, not the end. Enterprise CLM costs include implementation consulting (often $50,000-$200,000), ongoing admin resources (typically 0.5-1.0 FTE), integration development, data migration, and annual maintenance. A $100,000/year license can easily become a $250,000/year commitment when all costs are included. Model the full picture before committing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we actually need enterprise CLM, or is mid-market enough?
This is the most important question to answer honestly. Enterprise CLM makes sense when you manage 5,000+ contracts across multiple business units, need deep ERP/CRM integration, face strict regulatory compliance requirements, or have dedicated legal operations staff to administer the platform. If your legal team has fewer than 10 people and your contract volume is under 2,000 per year, a mid-market CLM tool like Juro, SpotDraft, or Bind will likely serve you better at a fraction of the cost and implementation time. See how Bind works for in-house legal teams.
How long does enterprise CLM implementation take?
Plan for 3 to 12 months, depending on the platform and scope. Ironclad and Leah typically deploy in 3 to 6 months. Icertis and SAP Ariba implementations commonly run 6 to 12 months, sometimes longer for global rollouts. Key factors that extend timelines include the number of contract types being migrated, integration complexity with existing enterprise systems, and the number of business units being onboarded simultaneously.
What is the real total cost of enterprise CLM?
License fees are typically 40-60% of total first-year cost. Budget for implementation consulting ($50,000-$200,000), data migration, integration development, training and change management, and ongoing admin resources. A platform with a $100,000 annual license often costs $200,000-$300,000 in the first year and $130,000-$160,000 in subsequent years when all costs are included.
Can we start with one department and expand?
Yes, and this is often the smartest approach. Most enterprises start with legal or procurement, prove value, and then expand to other business units. Ironclad and Agiloft are particularly well-suited to phased rollouts because their workflow engines can be configured independently per department. The risk with this approach is buying a platform sized for eventual enterprise-wide use when your initial use case could be served by a simpler, less expensive tool.
What about AI in enterprise CLM?
AI capabilities vary significantly across platforms. Sirion and Leah have the most advanced AI agent architectures, with specialized agents for extraction, review, risk scoring, and obligation tracking. Ironclad's Jurist AI is strong for automated contract review. Icertis provides AI-powered contract intelligence at portfolio scale. Every vendor now claims AI capabilities, but the depth and maturity differ substantially. During evaluation, ask vendors to demonstrate their AI on your actual contracts, not pre-prepared samples.
Related Articles
